Needs Assessment and Accountability

NEEDS ASSESSMENT DATA – SPRING/SUMMER 2011

Data used included:

Parent Surveys
Student Surveys
Teacher Surveys
EOG test results
Stakeholder meetings

Information gained identified the following needs:

Parents listed the top priorities as:
Technology based instruction
Working Website
Cleaner buildings
School sports

Information gained identified the following needs:

Parents listed the top priorities as:
Technology based instruction
Working Website
Cleaner buildings
School sports

Teachers listed the top priorities as:
More planning time
Technology and research based instruction
Working Website
School wide behavior plan

EOG results indicated high need:
Reading skills
Math skills
Subgroup priorities for the EOG results indicate:
Students with disabilities
Female students in math

Students listed priorities as:
More sports
More computer time
Better lunches

The needs were narrowed by the Stakeholders to the top three including:
Top needs are:
~Technology based instruction in Reading and Math
~Research based instruction in Reading and Math
~Develop working website
~Development of improved school wide safety plan

BRIDGES SCHOOL

EOG TEST RESULTS

Summary

End of Grade (Reading) Grades 3 through 8
Students Taking All Tests

97D000 - Bridges Charter School - 0K-08
Gender and Ethnicity Subgroups

	2010-2011
Student Subgroup	# At or Above Level III	# Valid Scores	Percent At or Above Level III
All Students	54	85	63.5%
Female	25	36	69.4%
Male	29	49	59.2%
Two or More Races	-	5	>95%
White	49	79	62.0%

THOSE NOT LISTED INDICATE SUBGROUP IS TOO SMALL TO REPORT VALUE

End of Grade (Reading) Grades 3 through 8
97D000 - Bridges Charter School - 0K-08
Detailed Gender / Ethnicity Breakdowns

	2010-2011
Student Subgroup	# At or Above Level III	# Valid Scores	Percent At or Above Level III
Female - White	23	33	69.7%
Male - White	26	46	56.5%
Economically Disadvantaged	41	66	62.1%
Not Economically Disadvantaged	13	19	68.4%
Not Limited English Proficient	54	85	63.5%
Migrant	*	*	*
Not Migrant	54	85	63.5%

* Indicates that the student population in the subgroup is too small to report the value.

THOSE NOT LISTED INDICATE SUBGROUP IS TOO SMALL TO REPORT VALUE

End of Grade (Reading) Grades 3 through 8
Students Taking All Tests

97D000 - Bridges Charter School - 0K-08
Disability Subgroups

	2010-2011
Student Subgroup	# At or Above Level III	# Valid Scores	Percent At or Above Level III
Students With Disabilities	16	33	48.5%
Non-Disabled Students	38	52	73.1%
Specific Learning Disability	9	19	47.4%
Other Health Impairment	4	6	66.7%
Speech or Language Impairment	4	7	57.1%

THOSE NOT LISTED INDICATE SUBGROUP IS TOO SMALL TO REPORT VALUE

End of Grade (Mathematics) Grades 3 through 8
Students Taking All Tests

97D000 - Bridges Charter School - 0K-08
Gender and Ethnicity Subgroups

	2010-2011
Student Subgroup	# At or Above Level III	# Valid Scores	Percent At or Above Level III
All Students	47	85	55.3%
Female	18	36	50.0%
Male	29	49	59.2%
Two or More Races	3	5	60.0%
White	44	79	55.7%

THOSE NOT LISTED INDICATE SUBGROUP IS TOO SMALL TO REPORT VALUE

End of Grade (Mathematics) Grades 3 through 8
Students Taking All Tests

97D000 - Bridges Charter School - 0K-08
Detailed Gender / Ethnicity Breakdowns

	2010-2011
Student Subgroup	# At or Above Level III	# Valid Scores	Percent At or Above Level III
Female - White	17	33	51.5%
Male - White	27	46	58.7%
Economically Disadvantaged	36	66	54.5%
Not Economically Disadvantaged	11	19	57.9%
Limited English Proficiency	*	*	*
Not Limited English Proficient	47	85	55.3%
Migrant	*	*	*
Not Migrant	47	85	55.3%

* Indicates that the student population in the subgroup is too small to report the value.

THOSE NOT LISTED INDICATE SUBGROUP IS TOO SMALL TO REPORT VALUE

End of Grade (Mathematics) Grades 3 through 8
Number and Percent of Students At or Above Achievement Level III in Mathematics
Students Taking All Tests

97D000 - Bridges Charter School - 0K-08
Disability Subgroups

	2010-2011
Student Subgroup	# At or Above Level III	# Valid Scores	Percent At or Above Level III
Students With Disabilities	17	33	51.5%
Non-Disabled Students	30	52	57.7%
Specific Learning Disability	7	19	36.8%
Multiple Disabilities	*	*	*
Other Health Impairment	5	6	83.3%
Orthopedic Impairment	*	*	*
Speech or Language Impairment	4	7	57.1%

* Indicates that the student population in the subgroup is too small to report the value.

THOSE NOT LISTED INDICATE SUBGROUP IS TOO SMALL TO REPORT VALUE

The percentage and number of students are not shown if the percentage is greater than 95 percent or less than 5 percent.